I am right, and you, are wrong.

I am right; unequivocally, undeniably, and verifiably right. The truth itself is proof of my correctness, and the evidence is clear, on the fact, that I am right. How do I know that I am right? Because I am right. And no other proof is needed other than that. It is so obvious I am right that I do not even need to prove that I am right, because I am right, and you are in fact, wrong. It is obvious you are wrong, because you say things that are wrong, while I am indeed, correct, and therefore this invalidating you as potentially being the one, that is also right, at the same time. The truth is the truth, and you just need to face reality and except what exists as true in the real world, for it is me who is right, and you who is wrong. What is it I am right about, and you are wrong about? It doesn't matter, for I am right, and just as importantly, you, are wrong.

Now some of you may in fact believe that it is you, in fact, who is right, and that is me, who perhaps, could be wrong. However, that is wrong, and I am right, therefore proving I am correct, and that therefore you are wrong. This is obviously true, and is so obvious that it's proof in and of itself that I am right, effectively making you wrong. How could we evaluate the reasons why you are wrong, and why am I right, what life choices effectively lead up to this point to prove, that I am in fact, correct, and you are wrong? We could spend all day ad nausem coming up with reasons why, but the important point is that I am right, and you are wrong, and you should know that, as it is true.

One might ask for pesky things like "evidence" or "proof" that I am right, or what it is that I am even right about it, but that just proves further that it is me, who is right, as I do not need to ask for such petty things like proof when I already know that I am correct. Can you, then, too, maybe, be correct by saying the things I do? Perhaps, but it is important to remember that it is me, who is right, and you who is simply stating that which is right of which I have already stated. I do need need to prove anything, and have no burden of proof, while you do have burden of proof of proving that the truth is incorrect. Why should I have to prove the obvious, when in reality, you need to prove that you are in fact correct, and somehow proved me, and the universe, wrong? In my own head, I am right, and therefore as that is the extent of the universe, that proves that I am right. Can anyone refute me on such claims? Doubtful. By merely trying to prove you are right, you have already proved that you are wrong. I am already right, and automatically so, thus making me the victor. Perhaps it is true that one day, I could be wrong, but that is also wrong, as am I never wrong, and always right. It is not even worth bothering with others that are wrong, as I am right, and thus have nothing to gain from the interaction.


And therefore and thusly, I win.